Calling a Spade a Spade

Since some people seem to insist on arguing that Republicans are hypocrites because John McCain's tax plan is supposedly just as "socialistic" as Barrack Obama's, I'm going to break it down in the clearest terms possible and explain why Republicans are not guilty of the ultimate sin liberals carp about constantly (a.k.a. hypocrisy), and why BHO is just another typical liberal stooge.

- When conservatives, or even pseudo-liberals like McCain enact a tax cut, they are reducing the amount of taxes that are withheld from income or capitol gains. That, in effect, means that the government takes less money from the people earning it, and they in turn keep more of what they earn to (gasp) do with as they please.

- When Obama says that 95% of the people are going to get a tax cut, he is being intellectually dishonest because more than 40% of people in the country do not pay income taxes since they either don't earn enough money or qualify for tax breaks. What Obama is talking about is taxing the people who have money - you know, the evil rich people who run all the businesses and investments that create the jobs people need to survive - and take their money and giving it to people who didn't earn it.

That is called Income Redistribution. It is one party, in this case Obama - arbitrarily deciding to take money he didn't earn to give it to other people who didn't earn it either, and in return prances around on TV telling the people who didn't earn the money that they should follow him.

Income Redistribution was the center of Karl Marx's attempt to create a classless society, and despite it's historically documented abject failure as a political philosophy, Barrack Hussein Obama, along with Joe Biden, Barney Frank, Nanzi Pelozi, Harry Reid and the rest of the liberal socialist spam-monkeys in the House and Senate embrace the outright theft of personal wealth in exchange for buying votes from the poor people they have made dependent on government support to survive.

You want to talk hypocrisy? Republicans are lambasted all the time for their dependence on rich voters for their support and gain power through the wealthy attaining more wealth. O.K., fine. Then what does it mean then when democrats in return depend on poor people for their votes and gain more power by poor people getting poorer?

When Republicans favor the rich getting richer and oppose stealing from them because they're rich, the worst anyone can accuse them of is not standing in the way of someone else attaining their piece of the American dream, which has no limitation. That is not hypocritical.

Democrats, on the other hand, prance around all over the place wanting to beat their chests and tell the world how compassionate they are, but the moment a poor person doesn't want to be poor anymore, or Republicans advance an agenda that will help prevent more poor people (such as them forcing a limit on welfare that made people get off their lazy asses and get jobs), democrats take a dump their collective skirts howling in protest, calling it cruel.

Democrats are the ultimate hypocrites because they derive their power at the expense of people who work for a living in exchange for fostering a larger number of people incapable of self-sufficiency to keep them dependent on democrats for survival. What democrats have done to the black community is nothing short of treating them like cattle, but democrats consider that compassion.